Advogado Completo: Sincronização Automática executada pelo autor - Dicionário Brasileiro Linguagem Jurídica

2026-05-20T09:49:32Z

Sincronização Automática executada pelo autor - Dicionário Brasileiro Linguagem Jurídica

Página nova

{{Info/Verbete Jurídico
|termo = zoning
|classe_terminologica = Direito Comparado
|nivel_tecnico = Profissional
|idioma_origem = Inglês
|areas_do_direito = Direito Internacional, Direito Comparado, Inglês Jurídico
|jurisdicao = EUA/Brasil
|semantic_id = marcilio:zoning
}}
{{Progresso do texto}}

== Significado Prático ==
#zoning | zoneamento.\n_________________________________\n_________________________________\n\n\n________________\n_____________________\n\nAtualizações\na partir de\njulho 2020:\n\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/29/us/supreme-court-\nabortion-louisiana.html:\n\n\nSupreme Court Strikes Down (declara\ninconstitucional) Louisiana Abortion Law, With\nRoberts the Deciding Vote\nThe case, over a state law requiring doctors\nperforming abortions to have admitting privileges at\nnearby hospitals, is the first abortion ruling since\ntwo Trump appointees joined the court.\nThe Supreme Court on Monday struck down a\nLouisiana law that could have left the state with a\nsingle abortion clinic, dashing the hopes of\nconservatives who were counting on President\nTrump’s appointments to lead the court to sustain\nrestrictions on abortion rights and, eventually, to\n#overrule (revogar o precedente) Roe v. Wade.\n\nEm\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_Medical_Services,_LLC_v.\n_Russo:\n\nJune Medical Services, LLC v. Russo, 591\nU.S. ___ (2020),\n• was a United States Supreme Court case in\nwhich the Court ruled that a\n• Louisiana state law placing\n• hospital-admission requirements on abortion\nclinics doctors was\n• unconstitutional.\n• The law mirrored a Texas state law that the\nCourt found unconstitutional in 2016 in Whole\nWoman's Health v. Hellerstedt (WWH).\n\nHolding:\n• The Louisiana law requiring abortion doctors\n• to have admitting privileges\n• at a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic\n• imposes an undue burden on\n• a woman's right to obtain an abortion.\n_______________\n__________________\n\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/29/us/politics/cfpb-\nsupreme-court.html:\n\n\nSupreme Court Lifts Limits on Trump’s Power to Fire\nConsumer #Watchdog (entidade de defesa /\nentidade fiscalizadora)\nThe case concerning the Consumer Financial\nProtection Bureau was part of a politically charged\nbattle over presidential authority.\n• The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that\nthe president is\n• free to fire the director of the\n• Consumer Financial Protection Bureau\n• without cause.\n• The decision,\n• rejecting a federal law that sought to place\nlimits on presidential oversight (fiscalização)\nof independent agencies,\n• was a victory for the conservative\nmovement to curb the administrative state.\n\nEm\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seila_Law_v._Consumer_Financ\nial_Protection_Bureau:\nSeila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection\nBureau, 591 U.S. ____ (2020)\n• was a U.S. Supreme Court case which\ndetermined that the\n• structure of the Consumer Financial\nProtection Bureau (CFPB),\n• with a single director who could only be\nremoved from office "for cause",\n• violates the separation of powers.\n• The Court's 5–4 decision, issued on June 29,\n2020,\n• recognized that the directorship position\nwas #severable (independente; que não\ngera a nulidade de toda a lei) from the\nstatute that established the CFPB,\n• allowing the CFPB to continue to operate.\n\nHolding:\n• The CFPB’s leadership by a single individual\n• removable only for\no inefficiency,\n\no neglect, or\no malfeasance\n• violates the separation of powers.\n____________\n______________\n\n\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/30/us/supreme-court-\nreligious-schools-aid.html\n\nSupreme Court Gives Religious Schools More Access\nto State Aid\n• Religious schools should have the same\naccess to scholarships and funds as other\nprivate schools,\n• the justices ruled,\n• in a victory for conservatives.\n• The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that\nstates must allow religious schools to\nparticipate in programs that\n• provide scholarships to students attending\nprivate schools,\n• a decision that opened the door to more\npublic funding of religious education.\n\nFaith-based school; religious school = escola\nconfessional.\n\nMontana’s Constitution, like those of many other\nstates, restricts government aid to religious groups.\nThose provisions, often called Blaine amendments,\nwere initially adopted in the 19th century and often\nhad the goal of restricting funding for Catholic\nschools.\nIn a lengthy concurring opinion, Justice Alito\ndescribed the general history of Blaine\namendments, which he said were prompted by\nprejudice against Catholic immigrants. When the\ncase was argued in January, Justice Kavanaugh said\nthe amendments were “rooted in grotesque\nreligious bigotry against Catholics.”\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espinoza_v._Montana_Departm\nent_of_Revenue:\n\n\n#Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue,\n591 U.S. ___ (2020),\n• was a #landmark (#caso paradigma) United\nStates Supreme Court case in which the\nCourt ruled that a\n• state-based scholarship program that\nprovides public funds to allow students to\nattend private schools\n• cannot discriminate against religious\nschools\n• under the Free Exercise Clause of the\nConstitution.\no tag #paradigma\n\nHolding:\n• The application of the no-aid provision\n• discriminated against religious schools and\n• the families whose children attend or hope\nto attend them\n• in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the\nFederal Constitution.\n_______\n__________\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locke_v._Davey\n\nLocke v. Davey, 540 U.S. 712 (2004),\n• is a United States Supreme Court decision\n• upholding the constitutionality of a\n• Washington publicly funded scholarship\nprogram which\n• excluded students pursuing a "degree in\ndevotional theology."\n• This case examined the "room.. between the\ntwo Religion Clauses", the Free Exercise\nClause and the Establishment Clause.\nHolding:\n• A Washington publicly funded scholarship\nprogram\n• which excluded students pursuing a "degree\nin theology"\n• does not violate the Free Exercise Clause.\n______\n______\n\n\nhttps://legal-\ndictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Son+of+Sam+law:\n\nSon of Sam Laws\nLaws that enable a state to use the proceeds a\ncriminal earns from recounting his or her crime in a\nbook, movie, television show, or other depiction.\nThe laws are named after David Berkowitz, a New\nYork serial killer who left a note signed "Son of\nSam" at the scene of one of his crimes.\n\nSince 1977 forty-two states and the federal\ngovernment have enacted various types of Son of\nSam laws that take any proceeds a criminal earns\nfor selling the story of his crime and give them to\nthe victims of the crime or to a victims'\ncompensation fund. Since a 1991 U.S. Supreme\nCourt ruling struck down the New York law as\nunconstitutional, states have sought ways to modify\ntheir laws to avoid similar decisions. Despite the\napparent virtue of denying criminals the ability to\nprofit from their crimes, serious First Amendment\nissues have been raised about Son of Sam laws.\n\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_%26_Schuster,_Inc._v._\nCrime_Victims_Board:\n\nSimon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board,\n502 U.S. 105 (1991),\n• was a Supreme Court case dealing with\n• Son of Sam laws,\n• which are state laws that prevent\nconvicted criminals from publishing\nbooks about their crime for profit.\n• Simon & Schuster challenged the law's\napplication to profits from Nicholas\nPileggi's book Wiseguy: Life in a Mafia\nFamily,\n• which was written with paid assistance\nfrom former mobster Henry Hill.\n• The court struck down the Son of Sam\nlaw in New York on the ground that the\nlaw was violative of the First\nAmendment,\n• which protects free speech.\n\n• Nevertheless, similar laws in other\nstates remain unchallenged.\n• The opinion of the court was written by\nSandra Day O'Connor.\n• In the wake of this case, New York\nmodified its law to\n• apply to any economic benefits derived\nfrom criminal activities,\n• not just proceeds from publications.\n__________\n\nApesar de haver afirmações de que ‘statu quo’ seria\nmais correto que “status quo”, a maioria dos\ndicionários utilizam #status quo.\nVide: Black’s, Merriam Webster, Aurélio.\nhttps://duvidas.dicio.com.br/status-quo-ou-statu-quo/\n__________\n\n\n#procedure\npro·ce·dure | \ prə-ˈsí-jər\n__________\n\nEmpresa #locadora de carros = car-rental company\nNa inglaterra = #car-hire company\n______\n\nTo deny #certiorari = negar admissibilidade ao recurso\n(à US Supreme Court).\ncer·tio·ra·ri | \ ˌsər-sh(i-)ə-ˈrér-i\n_____________\n

== Simplificação de Linguagem (Lei 15.263/2025) ==
Abaixo, a comparação prática de aplicação do termo sob a ótica do acesso à justiça:

{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%; border-collapse:collapse; border:1px solid #c8ccd1;"
! style="background:#eaecf0; color:#202122; width:50%; padding:8px; text-align:left;" | Redação Formal (Juridiquês)
! style="background:#e6f4ea; color:#137333; width:50%; padding:8px; text-align:left;" | Redação Cidadã (Linguagem Simples)
|-
| style="vertical-align:top; padding:10px; background:#f8f9fa;" | ''"O correspondente para o termo 'zoning' em processos transnacionais..."''
| style="vertical-align:top; padding:10px; background:#f4fbf7; font-weight:500;" | "#zoning | zoneamento...."
|}

== Detalhes Classificatórios ==
* '''Áreas do Direito associadas:''' Direito Internacional, Direito Comparado, Inglês Jurídico
* '''Classe Terminológica:''' Direito Comparado
* '''Natureza Jurídica:''' Termo e Conceito Estrangeiro
* '''Nível Técnico sugerido:''' Profissional

== Aspectos Linguísticos ==
* '''Idioma originário:''' Inglês
* '''Etimologia:''' Origem da linguagem jurídica norte-americana / direito comparado.
* '''Pronúncia ou leitura recomendada:''' zoning

== Referência Bibliográfica ==
* Dicionário Marcílio Atualizado Constantemente (2024)

[[Categoria:Dicionário Brasileiro de Linguagem Jurídica]]
[[Categoria:Direito Comparado]]
[[Categoria:Direito Direito Internacional]]
[[Categoria:Direito Direito Comparado]]
[[Categoria:Direito Inglês Jurídico]]

Zoning - Histórico de revisão

Advogado Completo: Sincronização Automática executada pelo autor - Dicionário Brasileiro Linguagem Jurídica