Bar review

   bar review

ID Semântico:	marcilio:bar-review
Classe:	Direito Comparado
Nível Técnico:	Profissional
Origem do Termo:	Inglês
Áreas de Foco:	Direito Internacional, Direito Comparado, Inglês Jurídico
Jurisdição:	EUA/Brasil

Progresso do texto
		Início
		Básico
		Criação
		Desenvolvimento
		Maturação
		Revisão
		Desenvolvido
		Finalização
		Abrangente

Significado Prático

1. bar review = #curso preparatório para o exame da\nOrdem (de Advogados - #OAB, #ABA)\n______________\n\n\n• If one aids, abets or facilitates the\ncommission of a crime\no with the intent that the crime be\ncommitted,\no one can be found guilty on\n#accomplice liability theories\n(responsabilidade do #coautor ou\n#partícipe).\no Nota: #accomplice pode ser\n#coautor ou #partícipe, dependendo\ndo contexto. Vide Black’s.\n• …\n• The scope of liability includes liability for the\nintended crime and all other #foreseeable\n(#previsível) crimes committed by the\nprincipals.\n• ….\n_____________\n\n\n• Insanity is a defense to all crimes because\ninsanity #negates culpability (afastar a\n\n#culpabilidade) even if the requisite intent\nnecessary for criminal liability is present.\n• The M'Naghten test (cognitive test) is\no basically a test of whether the\ndefendant's mental disease\no prevents her from understanding\nright from wrong (i.e. morally or\nlegally).\no …\n________________\n\n\n\nHe testified that the attorney who represented him\nin the theft case had told him that, because he had\nbeen placed on #probation, he had not been\nconvicted of a crime.\nHe had served his #probationary period (prazo de\n#suspensão [condicional da pena], art. 77, CP)\nsatisfactorily and been discharged from probation.\n___________\n\n\n\n\n• #Voluntary manslaughter is an intentional\nkilling that would be murder\n• but for the existence of\no 1 - #adequate provocation (#injusta\nprovocação),\no 2 - #imperfect self-defense, or\n\no 3 - #diminished capacity (#semi-\nimputabilidade).\n\n• #Involuntary manslaughter is an\nunintentional killing that results either from\no (i) criminal negligence or\no (ii) #misdemeanor-murder.\n________\n\n\nCommon-law murder = second-degree murder\n_______________\n\n\n\n\nDutton's good faith belief concerning his parental\nrights in supervising children (i.e. mistake of law)\ndoes not #override (#afastar) his legal duty to\nprovide reasonable care for his 8-year-old son.\nDutton's failure to provide food or to call a doctor\nwas a #breach (#violação) of this legal duty.\n____________\n\n\n• In order to prove #attempt (requisitos da\n#tentativa), the state must show that\no (1) defendant intended to commit\nthe crime (#dolo de consumação)\nand that\n\no (2) she committed an #overt act\nbeyond mere preparation (#início da\nexecução).\n\n• Dodd was about to set foot on Vance's\nproperty when he was arrested.\n• Dodd's actions went beyond mere\npreparation and constituted a substantial\nstep toward #completing (#consumar) the\ncrime.\n_____________________\n\nThe #state introduced evidence (a #promotoria /\n#acusação / #Ministério Público apresentou\nprovas) that they agreed to go to Nelson's house to\ntake stock certificates from a safe in Nelson's\nbedroom, that they went to the house, and that\nthey were arrested as they entered Nelson's\nbedroom.\n________________\n\n\nWithout the intent to commit larceny, Bennett\ncould not have had a "meeting of the minds" to\nconspire to commit larceny with Adams and Curtis.\nThus, if the jury believes Bennett, it should find him\nnot guilty because he did not intend to steal.\n\n_____________\n\n• Conspiracy requires\no (1) an agreement to commit a crime\nbetween two or more people,\n\no (2) an intent to enter into an\nagreement,\no (3) an intent to pursue an unlawful\nobjective (i.e. meeting of the minds)\nand\no (4) an overt act in furtherance of the\nconspiracy.\n▪ → portanto, não basta o\nmero acordo.\n▪ Deve haver algum ato\n(conduta) em início de\nexecução do crime.\n\no Mistake of fact is a defense to\nconspiracy because if the facts were\nas the alleged #co-conspirator\n(membro da #associação criminosa /\n#quadrilha) honestly believed them\nto be, the #conspirators (idem)\nwould not be committing a crime\nand, therefore, there is no intent to\npursue an unlawful objective and no\ncriminal liability for conspiracy.\n\n\nWithout the intent to commit larceny, hecould not\nhave had a "meeting of the minds" (#pactum\nsceleris) to conspire to commit larceny with X and\nY.\n\n_____________\n

Simplificação de Linguagem (Lei 15.263/2025)

Abaixo, a comparação prática de aplicação do termo sob a ótica do acesso à justiça:

Redação Formal (Juridiquês)	Redação Cidadã (Linguagem Simples)
"O correspondente para o termo 'bar review' em processos transnacionais..."	"#bar review = #curso preparatório para o exame da..."

Detalhes Classificatórios

• Áreas do Direito associadas: Direito Internacional, Direito Comparado, Inglês Jurídico
• Classe Terminológica: Direito Comparado
• Natureza Jurídica: Termo e Conceito Estrangeiro
• Nível Técnico sugerido: Profissional

Aspectos Linguísticos

• Idioma originário: Inglês
• Etimologia: Origem da linguagem jurídica norte-americana / direito comparado.
• Pronúncia ou leitura recomendada: bar review

Referência Bibliográfica

• Dicionário Marcílio Atualizado Constantemente (2024)